While reading Swapan Dasgupta’s take on the Rushdie affair, I stumbled on these lines (emphasis added):
Those who felt offended and let down by Rushdie?s absence from Jaipur were regarded as inconsequential members of the non-voting classes.
Their protests could safely be disregarded.
It struck me that this was also the reason why the government did the shameless “dance” on Lokpal Bill.. and capitulated in the case of Rushdie.
And then I came across this remarkable essay by Arun Shourie on Vote Banks (do read, if you have not already) in which he ......
Preparing for the Perfect Storm
Sat, 01/28/2012 - 05:15
Related Articles
- Being insensitive to Hindus and pretending to be sensitive to Muslims is enough to make one secular in India
- Fatwa-justifying-protests-against-Rushdie-visit
- We-did-not-pose-threat-to-Rushdie-Muslim-bodies
- Question-mark-over-Rushdie-video-chat
- Salman Rushdie: Politicians in bed with extremists for electoral gains
- Jaipur-Lit-Fest-hopes-Rushdie-attends-despite-protests
- Congress using 'Rushdie dish' to woo Muslims: Uma Bharati
- Making A Tradition
- Salman Rushdie to Batla House ? Column in Rediff
- HISTORICAL CONSCIOUSNESS IN SALMAN RUSHDIE`S ` MIDNIGHT CHILDREN`